Victor Jung

CEO, V Global Holdings

  • About
  • Profile
  • Services
  • Principles
  • Recent Transactions

Archives for March 2017

After $225 Billion in Deals Last Year, China Reins In Overseas Investment

March 12, 2017 by Victor Jung

By KEITH BRADSHERMARCH 12, 2017 – NY Times

At a briefing during the annual meeting of China’s congress, Zhong Shan, the country’s commerce minister, castigated what he called “blind and irrational investment.” CreditGreg Baker/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

BEIJING — China struck $225 billion in deals to acquire companies abroad last year, a record-breaking number that signaled to the world that Chinese business leaders were hot to haggle.

Now, China — with a worried eye on the money leaving its borders — is telling some of its companies to cool it down.

On Saturday, in the strongest public signal yet that Beijing is changing course, China’s commerce minister castigated what he called “blind and irrational investment.” At a news briefing during the annual meeting of China’s congress, the minister, Zhong Shan, said officials planned to intensify supervision of what he called a small number of companies.

“Some enterprises have already paid the price,” said Mr. Zhong, a protégé of President Xi Jinping. “Some even have had a negative impact on our national image.”

Just a day earlier, Zhou Xiaochuan, the country’s top central banker, had also questioned the wisdom of some recent Chinese overseas deals. “Some are not in line with our requirements and policies for overseas investment, such as in sports, entertainment and clubs,” he said. “This didn’t bring much benefit to China and caused some complaints overseas.”

The comments are the clearest confirmation that the government is hitting the brakes on the sometimes chaotic rush overseas by deep-pocketed Chinese companies with a reputation for having more money than deal-making aptitude.

“Are these guys in over their heads?” said Brock Silvers, a longtime investment banker in Shanghai. “The answer to me is, in some cases, they seem to be.”

A series of Chinese deals have come apart this winter — although it is not always clear whether Beijing stepped in or whether buyers themselves suddenly decided they were making a big mistake.

On Friday, the owners of Dick Clark Productions, which produces the Golden Globe Awards, said a $1 billion agreement to sell the company to the Chinese conglomerate Dalian Wanda had collapsed. Dalian Wanda, a real estate giant that has branched out into filmmaking and cinemas, had no immediate comment.

Chinese families and companies have been rushing to move money out of the country for more than a year amid worries over a slowing national economy, a weakening currency and numerous other problems. The outflow has been expensive — China has spent $1 trillion over the past two and a half years to shore up the value of its currency — and threatens to damage the country’s efforts to help its rising middle class.

In recent months, China has increased its efforts to stanch the flow, considerably tightening enforcement of its strict limits on how much money can move across its borders. The effort appears to be showing success: The most recent data, for February, showed a slight increase in the size of China’s huge holdings of foreign money managed by its currency administrator, one of the rough proxies for the sum of money moving out.

Among its moves, Beijing secretly told banks in late November that any movement of $5 million or more out of the country required special approval. Since then, regulators have also told each bank not to move more money out of the country for clients than they take in. Some banks had been moving up to six times as much money out of the country.

That rule has complicated not only mergers and acquisitions but also the way many global companies move their China-made profits overseas, in the form of dividends. That could put in question whether China is complying with its commitments to the International Monetary Fund, which are part of a broader Chinese effort to increase the profile of the country’s currency.

Foreign executives describe broad difficulties moving money out of China. “On dividend payments, European Union companies experience more tedious paperwork, extended times of processing and the issue of breaking up the dividends over several months if it is a sizable amount,” said Jörg Wuttke, the president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.

Mr. Zhou, China’s central banker, said on Friday that dividends should not be subject to restrictions, but he did not go into details.

China’s $225.4 billion in announced deals for overseas properties last year amounted to more than double 2015’s total, according to Dealogic, a data firm that tracks deals.

Deal makers say China is likely to continue to be active in overseas acquisitions this year, especially as it moves to add technical know-how to its portfolio. The country’s biggest deal announced last year, for the Swiss agricultural giant Syngenta, is widely expected to close this year, although it faces regulatory hurdles.

Chinese officials appear eager to portray China’s tougher stance on deals abroad as an effort to prompt more responsible investing rather than an effort to shore up the country’s financial system. Mr. Zhong, the commerce minister, said the country had not changed its long-term policy of encouraging Chinese companies to become more global.

But Chinese officials have a strong incentive not to acknowledge the administrative limits they have put on large movements of money out of the country. Such limits may make foreign investors more wary of putting money into China, at a time when Chinese leadership is trying to encourage more bond purchases by foreigners and other investments into the country to offset the money moving out.

In one of the biggest Chinese deals to come apart, Anbang Insurance, a politically connected company with a murky ownership structure, abruptly pulled out of a $14 billion deal to buy Starwood Hotels and Resorts.

Some of the other deals involved real estate firms or gritty industrial companies that have tried to buy their way into Hollywood — a trend that has also dismayed some in Washington, who worry that China may be acquiring too much influence over American entertainment.

Anhui Xinke New Materials, a copper processing company in central China, made a deal in November to buy Voltage Pictures, an American film financing and production company, for $350 million. A month later, Anhui Xinke pulled out of the transaction before its completion.

Many Chinese companies already have a lot of money overseas. More than $500 billion sluiced out of the country in the few months after the stock market plummeted in summer 2015 and before China began gradually enforcing previously dormant rules on money transfers in February 2016. Much of that money is still being allocated to longer-term investments, along with another $50 billion or more that is leaving the country each month and the accumulated earnings on previous investments made overseas.

Qiang Li, a managing partner for China at the law firm DLA Piper, said that only a quarter of the many deals in which he was involved relied on transferring money out of China and might face obstacles. The rest are proceeding without difficulty because they use Chinese-owned dollars that are already overseas, he said.

“There is no question,” he said, “that investors will continue to invest overseas, by getting the proper approvals.”

Ailin Tang contributed research.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Victor Jung Tagged With: china, overseas investment

The President Changed. So has small businesses’ confidence. – Victor Jung

March 12, 2017 by Victor Jung

By LANDON THOMAS Jr.MARCH 12, 2017. NYTimes.com

Louis M. Soltis owns a small company that manufactures control panels for large factories and machines. After four years of not adding to his work force of 22, he is looking to take on as many as six new workers.CreditBrittany Greeson for The New York Times

TOLEDO, Ohio — The cream of the small-business community here tucked into their lunch on a top floor of a bank building and pondered the question put to them by their local lender’s economist.

More than any other president since Ronald Reagan, President Trump is moving to strip away regulations and slash taxes, said Jeffrey Korzenik, an investment strategist with Fifth Third, a large regional bank in the Midwest and Southeast. In meetings with clients, Mr. Korzenik has been making the case that these policies will rouse the slumbering animal spirits in businesses across America.

“And now we have seen this huge spike in small-business confidence since the election,” Mr. Korzenik said, pointing to a chart. “So I have to ask you: Do you feel more confident now?”

There was a moment of silence, broken only by a howling northwestern Ohio wind that rattled the floor-to-ceiling windows in the bank’s boardroom.

Then, with rapid-fire speed, came the responses.

The president of a trucking company spoke of a “tremendous dark cloud” lifting when he realized he would no longer be feeling the burden of rules and regulations imposed by the Obama administration.

The owner of an automotive parts assembler gave thanks that he would not be receiving visits from pesky environmental and workplace overseers.

And the head of a seating manufacturer expressed hope that, finally, his health care costs would come down when the Affordable Care Act was repealed.

“My gut just feels better,” said Bob Fleisher, president of a local car dealership. “With Obama, you felt it was personal — like he just didn’t want you to make money. Now we have a guy who is cutting regulations and taxes. And when I see my taxes going down every quarter — well, that means I am going to start investing again.”

While much has been made about the stock market’s nearly 14 percent rally since the election, economists say that when it comes to assessing the genuine potential for the United States economy, confidence among small-business owners is a more grounded and forward-looking indicator.

Photo

Small-business owners from Toledo, Ohio, and nearby areas during an open forum at the Fifth Third Bank in downtown Toledo this month. CreditBrittany Greeson for The New York Times

Companies that employ several to a few hundred workers make up 99 percent of business in the United States and account for half of private sector employment. So for all that General Electric, Caterpillar or Ford Motor talks about building factories and hiring workers, the $18 trillion United States economy will not truly move until the burghers in Toledo and other parts of the country start to invest and add jobs.

The exuberance of small-city executives in Toledo, of course, represents just a small slice of the national economy — an economy whose recovery had already been showing signs of gaining momentum. And their euphoria is being fed by promises, like a tax overhaul, that have not yet been kept.

Still, the views from the Toledo lunch are very much in tune with what business leaders, large and small, have been consistently saying in the months since the election.

Billed as a C.E.O. round table, the event felt more like a boisterous group therapy session as one businessman interrupted another with competing tales of Obama-era regulatory woes.

But all 11 executives agreed: Never in recent years had they been so bullish about their businesses as they were now under a president (and fellow small-business owner, albeit a very rich one) whom they see as one of their own.

Which is why Mr. Korzenik was so excited about the recent surge in the small-business confidence index, as measured by the National Federation of Independent Business, the industry’s trade group.

In the month after Mr. Trump was elected, the gauge showed the largest monthly increase since 1986. And it has continued to reflect consistent gains as the president pushes for lower taxes, fewer regulations and a repeal of President Barack Obama’s health care initiative.

Of course, the jump came off low levels. Since 2009, the index had been either on a downward trend or barely moving up as small businesses struggled to recover from the financial crisis. A heavier regulatory burden and uncertainty born of a weak economic recovery have kept small-business owners from making big bets in investments or hiring.

But in Toledo, this reluctance is changing — and quickly.

Louis M. Soltis owns a small company that manufactures control panels for large factories and machines. After four years of not adding to his work force of 22, he has seen orders for panels jump in the last two months and is looking to take on as many as six new workers.

There may not be a direct correlation between his surging order book and the new president, but there is no doubting the psychological boost.

Photo

A view of Toledo. For years, many of the taller buildings have stood empty as the city suffered from the automotive industry’s decline. The local economy has been recovering as thriving industries like health care have picked up the slack. CreditBrittany Greeson for The New York Times

“That guy is a junkyard dog, doing his tweets at 3 a.m. and taking on the news media — I just get strength from him,” Mr. Soltis said over a wine-soaked dinner with a large group of his small-business friends and peers from around town. “And I have to say, it makes you feel gutsy — ready to step up and start investing again.”

The restaurant sits on the eastern bank of the Maumee River, offering up a view of the modest Toledo skyline. For years, many of the taller buildings have stood empty as this largely industrial city, a bit more than an hour’s drive south of Detroit, suffered from the automotive industry’s decline.

Of late, the local economy has been recovering as thriving industries like health care have picked up the slack, and the unemployment rate, at 4.7 percent, stands exactly at the national figure of 4.7 percent for February. The latest employment data, released on Friday, showed that 235,000 workers were added to payrolls nationwide last month.

Mr. Soltis is not the only small-business leader to report a sharp pickup in activity.

Barton S. Kulish, the president of MTS Seating, which makes seats and tables for restaurants and offices, said that his sales were up 38 percent after the election. Since the beginning of the year, he said he has had to bring on eight more workers (and plans to hire an additional 12) to his 418-employee company.

Bryan Keller, the chief executive of Keller Logistics, said a sharp rise in trucking orders since the election prompted him to recently increase his shipping rates.

And the local real estate market is still buzzing with news of a 300,000-square-foot industrial space, which, after drawing little interest for the better part of a year, suddenly became the target of a frantic bidding war among three local parties before finding a buyer.

Yet there is a downside to animal spirits that persist too long, especially in labor markets, like Toledo’s, that are operating on the tight side.

And that is a sharp uptick in inflation.

In his presentation to Fifth Third’s banking clients, Mr. Korzenik raised this issue, suggesting that the broader economy was in the “seventh inning” of what has been a pretty long business cycle.

He also noted how the opioid epidemic in the Midwest had made it harder for companies to find qualified young people ready to work — a comment that elicited nods from around the table.

Still, no one in the room seemed overly concerned. As the group saw it, the party was just beginning.

“Most businesses I know are just taking a deep breath, happy that there is finally someone in the White House who understands what they do,” said Mr. Fleisher, the owner of the Lincoln car dealership. “So you say we are in the seventh inning — well, I am not sure we are.”

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Victor Jung Tagged With: confidence, president, small businesses, US economy

Pam Liebman to brokers using StreetEasy’s Premier Agent: You’re on your own

March 7, 2017 by Victor Jung

Corcoran, Citi Habitats won’t reimburse residential real estate agent using controversial feature

March 03, 2017 02:45PM
By Katherine Clarke

TheRealDeal.com

Gary Malin and Pam Liebman (Credit: Larry Ford)

Two of New York City’s largest residential brokerages, the Corcoran Group and Citi Habitats, will not reimburse agents who wish to participate in StreetEasy’s new Premier Agent program, Corcoran CEO Pam Liebman said in a mass email to her brokers Thursday.

“We will not support Premier Agent,” Liebman wrote in the email, which was seen by The Real Deal. “If individual agents choose to take part in the program, you must do with your own credit card; there will be no reimbursement for any participation through your ad budgets.” Large brokerages typically provide marketing budgets for their agents, though the amounts vary widely.

In addition, both firms will discontinue all subscriptions in Streeteasy Pro as of March 31, she said. If agents want to continue their StreetEasy Pro memberships, they will have to foot the bills themselves.

The Premier Agent program, which StreetEasy rolled out on March 1, allows any agent who pays the listings platform a certain fee to be designated as the primary contact for another agent’s exclusive listing. StreetEasy parent Zillow has been running the program on its own site for years, and it’s been the publicly-traded firm’s biggest source of revenue by far, generating over $600 million last year.

Here’s how it works: Buyers who click on a contact form on a listing page for more information about a specific listing will then be directed by default to a “premier agent” who has paid StreetEasy for the privilege – though they can choose to change over to the listing broker. There will also be a concierge program, whereby buyers who call about a listing will be connected by a Zillow employee to a premier agent, who had paid to advertise in a particular zip code.

“Many of you have reached out to me or to your managers to tell us how upset you are about this feature,” Liebman wrote. “I was told yesterday that to buy 20 percent of one of the zip codes is $6,000 per month. The more people that participate in the program, the higher that prices will get.”

Liebman is not the first brokerage chief to denounce the feature, which StreetEasy expects will be a big revenue driver.
On Wednesday, Compass CEO Robert Reffkin said the industry should be aware of the increasing power that aggregators hold over brokers.

“As an agent, you have to make a decision,” he said. “By having a [StreetEasy] pro account and taking their links and sending them to your clients, those are two ways you’re paying them. If you’re really concerned about this, you shouldn’t do those things.”
Sources said the Real Estate Board of New York penned a letter to the New York Department of State requesting an investigation into the program, which the trade group says violates state laws governing advertising. REBNY claims it’s illegal for someone to advertise another broker’s exclusive listing.

A spokesperson for REBNY did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Liebman declined to comment on her position and Gary Malin, the president of Citi Habitats, was not immediately available.

Tags: Pamela Liebman, Real Estate Technology, residential real estate, streeteasy

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Capital Markets, Real Estate, Victor Jung Tagged With: Pamela Liebman, Real Estate Technology, residential real estate, streeteasy

Investors from Germany, Korea & Japan could fill Chinese void – Victor Jung

March 7, 2017 by Victor Jung

Negative interest rates will drive purchases

March 07, 2017 04:30PM
By Rich Bockmann

TheRealDeal.Com

Bill Shanahan

China supplanted Canada for the first time last year as the most active foreign investor in U.S. real estate. But so far this year, some Chinese institutional investors such as insurance companies have been silent, and the yuan’s appreciation against the dollar could shift Chinese buyers toward markets in Asia.

But if the big guns from China pull back from New York, there could be investors from Germany, Korea and Japan game to fill the void. Investors from those countries may be able to take advantage of arbitrage between overseas and local interest rates and make big-ticket deals, according to CBRE.

“We think the amount of Chinese investors that falls off may be enhanced by German investors and Japanese investors, in particular, as negative interest rates are driving capital out of those countries,” Spencer Levy, head of research in the Americas for CBRE, said Tuesday afternoon as the company released the results of its annual investor survey.

Bill Shanahan, co-chair of CBRE’s capital markets group in New York, said that’s exactly what he sees with Korean investors. Last year a group of South Korean insurance firms invested roughly $220 million in mezzanine debt for AXA Financial’s 787 Seventh Avenue.

“Korea has a 200-basis point negative arbitrage on currency,” he said. “One of the things they do is they borrow heavily here . . . because it’s a hedge in U.S. dollars.”

In CBRE’s survey of investors, about 40 percent said they planned to buy either the same amount or more property this year. About 30 percent of respondents said their largest motivation will be seeking yield spreads.

In September, North Carolina-based apartment REIT Bell Partners teamed up with the German firm HANSAINVEST to create a $1 billion fund focused on multifamily properties in the U.S.

And Shanahan said Germany’s Union Investment Real Estate, which entered the New York hotel market late last year with the purchase of Courtyard the New York Downtown Manhattan/World Trade Center for $206 million, is poised to invest more overseas.

“About two months ago, Union, probably for the first time in six or eight months, opened up one of their funds,” he said. “They got $800 million in a month and had to shut the gates because they can’t place the capital. They’re promising all their investors returns. So if you have all this cash laying around and it’s in a German bank – you’re basically getting no return – it’s a drag on the fund.”

“It’s also the same for Korea and it’s also the same for Japan,” Shanahan added, who said Japanese buyers are becoming more interested in New York City multifamily properties. “Rates in those home countries are either negative or they’re very, very low.”

Late last month, Japanese trading conglomerate Mitsui & Co. acquired a 20 percent stake in Los Angeles-based real estate investment firm CIM Group. Another Japanese conglomerate, ASO Group, made a splash by purchasing one of L.A.’s most notable properties, the Google-leased Spruce Goose hangar in Playa Vista.

Tags: bill shanahan, CBRE, foreign investment, real estate finance

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Capital Markets, Economy, Michael Shah, Real Estate, Victor Jung Tagged With: bill shanahan, CBRE, foreign investment, real estate finance

World’s Ultra Wealthy: Chinese buyers – Victor Jung

March 3, 2017 by Victor Jung

Chinese Buyers continue to dominate market. No EB-5 slowdown: Victor Jung

China minting 100K new millionaires each year: Knight Frank

March 02, 2017 03:10PM – TheRealDeal.com
By E.B. Solomont and Hiten Samtani

Wealth Report 2017 (Credit: Knight Frank, click to enlarge)

The number of ultra-high net worth individuals — those with assets of $30 million or more who’ve got the funds to purchase the world’s most desirable properties — jumped 42 percent over the past decade to 193,000 worldwide, according to a new Wealth Report from Knight Frank. New York City is home to more than 6,500 of these individuals, more than any other city in the world, the report shows, and the city is poised to see that number swell to over 8,500 by 2026.

On an annual basis, that’s 8,225 new UHNWIs each year across the globe since 2006. Some 60 percent of UHNWIs already own real estate overseas, Knight Frank said, a growing phenomenon that’s impacted property global values.

“This whole stateless, rootless wealth doesn’t feel tied or indebted to a single country,” said CNBC’s wealth editor Robert Frank, who moderated a panel that discussed the report’s findings.

And lest anyone fret that Chinese buyers will vanish from the market due to China’s crackdown on capital flows, the report shows that the country is still churning out heaps of millionaires, at the astounding rate of 100,000 new millionaires per year.

“This is market-moving levels of wealth,” said Liam Bailey, global head of research for London-based brokerage Knight Frank, which presented the report at the New York Public Library in partnership with Douglas Elliman.

Chinese investors alone pumped $30 billion into real estate around the world last year, a massive leap from $300 million a decade ago, according to the report. And despite the government’s new capital controls, which took effect in January, Bailey projected 80 percent more cross-border purchases over the next five years.

Andrew Hay, head of Knight Frank’s residential division, spoke of the two unexpected global events that will define the narrative for the flow of wealth in the next few years: The U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union, and the U.S. presidential election of Donald Trump.

“Brexit means Brexit’ and “America first and only America first’” will set the tone for the high-end real estate market, Hay said, influencing everything from interest rates to flight of capital to where buyers will choose to put down their funds.

Bailey addressed the drop in prices seen in London, viewed as New York’s biggest competitor for high-end home purchases. Following Brexit, London property values dropped more than 6 percent, and the number of UHNWIs there is projected to grow to 6,175 by 2026

In the U.S., Seattle’s luxury market saw the biggest upside, with prices growing 9.7 percent, while Los Angeles values rose 5.3 percent and New York values rose 3.5 percent. “More moderate growth is something we’re seeing increasingly around the U.S.,” said Bailey.

But that could change under President Trump and amid shifting geopolitics. Howard Lorber, chair of Elliman and a member of Trump’s economic advisory team, predicted on the panel that deregulation and tax reform under Trump would lead to “sustained growth,” or, practically speaking, “more money in people’s pockets.”

Addressing a question about the dearth of construction financing for new condos in New York, Lorber said that banking regulations were mostly to blame, and that more relaxed regulations under Trump would cause banks to loosen the purse strings.

While panelist Reaz Jafri, a partner at Withersworldwide, expressed concern about the administration’s immigration policy — including a travel ban on citizens from seven countries — Lorber dismissed those headwinds as a “short term issue.”

“There will be some suffering during this while it’s being worked out,” he said. “But, I don’t think a year from now we’ll be having this same conversation.”

Among the top 100 luxury markets, the the biggest gains in property values were seen in Shanghai, where prices jumped 27.4 percent. Other Asian cities dominated the list, including Beijing in the No. 2 spot with 26.8 percent, followed by Guangzhou (26.6 percent) and Seoul (16.6 percent).

Meanwhile, prices in Dubai were down 4 percent while Istanbul, which has been rocked by terrorist attacks, saw an 8.4 percent drop.

Tags: chinese buyers, Knight Frank, NYC Luxury Market, residential real estate

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Victor Jung Tagged With: Chinese buyers, chinese real estate buyers, Delshah, EB-5, Knight Frank, Michael Shah, NYC Luxury Market, residential real estate, Victor Jung

Chelsea residents file lawsuit to halt “monstrous” condo – Victor Jung

March 2, 2017 by Victor Jung

Community group claims city may have improperly approved the 11-story West 16th St. project

March 02, 2017 10:00AM

124 West 16th Street rendering (Credit: Einhorn Development Group via DNAinfo)

A neighborhood community group is suing the developer behind a planned 11-story residential building on West 16th street, claiming its plans may violate city codes and could have been improperly approved.

Einhorn Development Group is planning to build an 14-unit condominium building at 124 West 16th Street, DNAinfo reported. The building is next door the French Evangelical Church, which sold its air rights to the developer in 2014.

But a community group called “Save 16th Street Committee” has been fighting the plans — which they describe as “monstrous” — ever since. Last week, the group filed a petition in Manhattan Supreme Court, asking the Department of Buildings to release documents the group argues could prove Einhorn’s plans violate city statutes and codes, or that the department improperly approved the project.

Einhorn was originally planning to build a six-story building on the site, but filed a “post-approval amendment” with the DOB, according to the publication. The committee and its representatives submitted several Freedom of Information Law requests, which have not yet been resolved, according to the petition.

“The people in the neighborhood have every right to be enraged. It’s just really incomprehensible why we can’t get answers from them,” said an attorney for the committee, Stuart Klein. “We’re not asking for anything that they’re not required to give us.”

A DOB spokesman told the website the department hasn’t yet been served with the committee’s petition, and that the agency is still reviewing the FOIL request. [DNAinfo] — Miriam Hall

Tags: Einhorn Development Group, residential real estate

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Victor Jung Tagged With: Einhorn Development Group, residential real estate

London no longer calling: home prices fall post-Brexit – Victor Jung

March 2, 2017 by Victor Jung

Political uncertainty, new tax cool demand

March 02, 2017 10:30AM – THE REALDEAL.com

Homes in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

London home prices are falling in the wake of Britain’s vote to leave the European Union and a new tax on property sales.

The share of sellers who slashed asking priced rose in 31 of the city’s 33 boroughs between July and January, according to data by listings site Zoopla. In the luxury enclave of Kensington and Chelsea, the average price cut in January was 8.2 percent.

“Over the past two years some agents have been overvaluing to win business from sellers, but given the state of the market post-Brexit, buyers are now very astute and won’t over pay, and reductions are taking place,” Capital Estate Agents Joe Mourat told Bloomberg. “The British public are responsive to negative news, and we definitely saw a downturn in activity after the vote.”

Speaking at the Knight Frank wealth conference on Thursday, Liam Bailey, head of residential research at the brokerage, said London prices are down 6 percent.

London’s residential real estate market has long competed with New York for wealthy overseas investors. Uncertainty over Britain’s political future appears to have cooled demand for luxury apartments in its capital, but New York is dealing with its own uncertainty in the wake of Donald Trump’s Muslim travel ban.

In its March issue, The Real Deal broke down how anti-immigration policies are threatening New York real estate’s status as a safe haven for foreign capital.  [Bloomberg] — Konrad Putzier

Tags: brexit, london home prices, residential real estate

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Filed Under: Economy, Financial, New Developments, Real Estate, Victor Jung Tagged With: brexit, Knight Frank, london home prices, Real Estate, residential real estate, Victor Jung

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Medium
  • Twitter

What Happens to Mortgages and Debts When Real Estate Is in a Living Trust: Essential Guide

Many people put their home into a living trust to make transferring property easier after they die. But what actually happens to the mortgage or other … [Read More...]

Tags

19 Stanton 902-908 Bedford Ave barry sternlicht bill shanahan Brett David brexit Brooklyn Real Estate CBRE china Chinese buyers chinese real estate buyers confidence Delshah Donald Trump EB-5 Einhorn Development Group foreign investment george pataki greenwich ct hudson yards jeffrey levine Knight Frank london home prices Michael Shah New Developments NYC Luxury Market overseas investment oxford properties group Pamela Liebman president Real Estate real estate finance Real Estate Technology related companies residential real estate Rochelle's small businesses stephen ross Steve Yorsz streeteasy The Line Group The Real Deal TRD Shanghai US economy Victor Jung

Profile

💡 About Me Victor Jung is the founder of V Global Holdings, where for nearly two decades we’ve … Read More

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Medium
  • Twitter

Services

Since its founding in 1995, V Global Holdings has been at the forefront of reshaping business … Read More

Connect with me

Victor Jung
114 East 13th St FRNT 1
New York NY 10003

E: info@vgh-usa.com

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in